Have the Chops? Lets see it. CRM Idol Launches

Paul Greenberg, the Bob Dylan of CRM just announced the CRM Idol Contest this morning. The initiative is designed to find and showcase the best of the best CRM related software start ups out there.

Whilst this is billed as a CRM event, the event looks at the broader technology footprint that serves customers and prospects, but also employees and partners. As customers increasingly look for expert insight from organizations they want to do business with, its increasingly harder to only consider the set of capabilities traditionally offered under the CRM moniker. To truly create, nurture and manage customer relationships, cross pollination between folks across the enterprise (sales, marketing, channel, product, support, etc.) and prospect/ customers becomes important.

Paul has assembled some of the most well-respected names in traditional CRM and Enterprise Software as well as Social CRM, Social Media and Enterprise 2.0/Social Business. 

CRM Idol is a unique opportunity for those substantive start ups struggling to find or afford a stage and a microphone. And so, big kudos to Paul Greenberg for providing them with that opportunity. Paul’s contribution to the CRM industry is second to none and this event is one the few public examples in a string of good deeds, most of which you probably will never hear about.

This is going to be a blast but also extremely valuable to larger enterprise software ecosystem. Speaking from a social and collaboration view point, to those of us close to the topic it can seem like most of the innovation is near complete. But that couldn’t be further from reality. In the larger scheme of things there are gaping holes in todays technology stack and lots of room for good ideas to improve customer, partner and employee performance. So this event couldn’t be more timely.

Paul’s post has been cross posted below. Give it a good read to learn more, understand the criteria / deal-breakers, and above all, learn what it takes to win.

Submissions start today. Good luck to the contestants!

——————————————————-

Cross posted from Paul Greenberg’s ZDNet Blog:

Okay, everyone this is the big one. CRM Idol 2011: The Open Season is here and we’re ready to take your companies and find out which one of you in the Americas and which one of you in EMEA is not the next CRM Idol but the FIRST CRM Idol.

The Idea

Most of what we’re trying to do was outlined in the pre-announcement announcement of CRM Idol last week. But it bears some repeating:

Small companies – at least in the CRM software related world – and that means social software world, in this case, too – abound. There are thousands of companies out there that are possibly innovative, possibly commercially viable in a big way, possibly the next big thing. But, as we said, there are thousands of them. And, no matter how great your product is, if no one knows about it, well, then, oops. Not a good thing.

These small companies are all making efforts to get into the ecosystem that could benefit them – one which includes investors, influencers, technology/strategic partners, media connections, etc. While getting support from this powerful ecosystem is by no means a guarantee of success, it can be enormously helpful in getting well down the road there. But, those small companies are often thwarted in that effort by either really bad PR people, or just the incredible amount of companies out there trying to reach into the ecosystem who are pummeling the small amount of influencers, etc. every week with requests to demo or talk.

Now, to be fair to the influencers, they are human beings with lives that aren’t built around supporting this one company that really thinks they are it. All they know is that each of them is getting between 20-50 requests a week to take a demo or conversation with someone who owns or represents a company they’ve never heard of and never talked to yet. In addition to those that they know. Often enough, they are pitched by a public relations person who is either inexperienced or not really good at their job who makes no effort to find anything out about the person that they are pitching to. So the influencer, journalist, venture capitalist gets a generic curve thrown at them that doesn’t even break over the plate – guaranteeing that the email is going to be discarded as a matter of course before the first paragraph is even read. Or it could be that on a particular day the influencer got 10 pitches and had a headache and didn’t want to see any of them.

As unfair as generic pitches and high volumes of noise are to the influencers in the highly desirable ecosystem we are chatting about here, it is a problem because what are probably a lot of good companies are never given a chance to move ahead because of the difficulties inherent in the process and the vagaries of bad luck on any given day.

Which is why CRM Idol 2011: The Open Season exists.

The concept is simple, small companies out there. If you meet the submission criteria outlined below, you will be given the opportunity, first come first serve, to secure a time slot on a specific day that will put you in front of some of the most influential people in the CRM/SCRM world. They will spend an hour with you in a demo to hear about your technology product – software only – and they will write a jointly signed review of what they saw of you – that will be published in multiple venues as soon as its written. It can be a good review, a bad one, a mix or indifferent. There’s risk on your part to be taken here. But it is something that you need to be aware of. The reviews will go up as soon as the 5 judge sign off on the final content. They won’t be exhaustive reviews but they will be opinionated and fair.

Forty companies from the Americas and twenty companies from EMEA (that means ONLY Europe, the Middle East and Africa) will get a shot at this – again first come first serve (more later on what that means). Of the 40 in the Americas, 4 finalists will be chosen. (NOTE: There will be an APAC edition hopefully late in the year or if not, early 2012, depending on the success of these two events. Sorry, Asia, Australia, New Zealand, et.al. Logistics made it impossible at this juncture.) Out of the 20 in EMEA, 3 finalists will be chosen. Each of the finalists will be REQUIRED to do a ten minute video about their company and the product. Not a repeat of the demo but a video. Note I used the word REQUIRED here. Let me put it this way. If you make the finals and don’t do the video, we will publicly skewer your company. Know why? Because our judges are giving up what little free time they actually have in a summer to do this and it will take us 4 hours a day for 3 business weeks to do it. So if you can’t or won’t put in the effort to do the video, don’t bother to apply. Seriously. We’re trying to help out here and we want you guys all to succeed but it’s a two way street.

Okay, that rant out of the way. Once the finalists are chosen and the videos done, they will be posted online in multiple media outlets. They will be voted on in two ways:

  • Popular vote – see, crowdsourcing is important. All the votes for the one winner from the Americas and the one winner from EMEA will be tallied from the public sites – in aggregate. That’s 50% of the vote.
  • Extended Judges Panels – as you can see below, we may have assembled the greatest panels of judges – both leading vendors and influencers ever assembled in the history of CRM – not to be hyperbolic or anything. Each judge will select a specific winner in each of the Americas and EMEA from the 7 finalists. That’s the other 50% of the vote. The original judges will be voting as panel members.

The winners in each will get a major array of prizes, some of which are below, and be declared “CRM Idol 2011 Winner.”

Not too shabby is it? Vast amounts of media attention even if you don’t make the finals. If you make the finals at all, some prizes to you. The winners get everything that the ecosystem can offer but guaranteed success. But they do get all the accoutrements they need to support their increased likelihood of it.

That way, you small companies out there who have been victimized by bad approaches or just circumstance have the opportunity to bypass all of that and make something happen. It’s up to you to take the reins in hand but once you do, you have at least a serious chance at making yourself successful.

The Criteria

This competition is for small companies in the CRMish/SocialCRMish world. – see the categories below for some guidelines though please feel free to make the case if you don’t see yourself in the guidelines.

  • You have to have software that is commercially available by the time of the demo – that would be in August – again see below. No betas, alphas, release candidates allowed. If we find that you’re not commercially available, and you have a time slot, you’re out and someone else will fill the slot. So please be sure that you can verify the claim if you want to participate.
  • You have to have 3 referenceable customers that, if we care to, we can contact and ask about you.
  • You have to have revenue under $12 million U.S. your last fiscal year. As far as disclosure goes, you have the choice of making the claim that you do – though that will have to be stated in your submission and we’ll trust you or you can disclose your revenue in the submission with the knowledge that only the permanent judges will know what it is. If you make the claim, please be prepared to back it up if we ask. Your call on how.
  • You have to be willing to make a ten minute video if you get to the finals. More on that later.
  • You have to fit a category – though there is some leeway there.

The Categories

The categories that we’ve identified to start are:

  • Traditional CRM Suites
  • Social CRM
  • Sales – Sales Force Automation, Sales Optimization, Sales Effectiveness
  • Marketing – Marketing Automation, Revenue Performance Management, Social Marketing, Email Marketing, Enterprise Marketing Management, Database Marketing
  • Customer Service – all permutations
  • Mobile CRM
  • Customer Experience Management
  • Social Media Monitoring – requires the possibility of integrating with a CRM technology
  • Customer Analytics – including text/sentiment analytics; voice based analytics; social media analytics, influencer scoring, etc.
  • Enterprise Feedback Management
  • Innovation Management
  • Community Platforms
  • Enterprise 2.0 – collaboration, activity streams etc.
  • Social Business
  • Knowledge Management – this one requires the possibility of integrating with CRM systems
  • Vendor Relationship Management
  • Partner Relationship Management

Once again, if you don’t see yourself in this list, don’t worry. Just make the case as to why you have some customer-facing possibilities and the likelihood is that we’ll be cool with it. We’re trying to make this easier for you, not hard.

The Rules

They are numbered to be entirely clear.

Submissions

There will be 40 slots made available in the Americas and 20 in EMEA.

The submission will be by email ONLY to: nextbigthing@crmidol.com. (See below to see this again and what to do if there are problems). Any other attempt at submission will be rejected out of hand with the problem exception mentioned below.

The submissions will occur starting today – Monday, April 25 and will continue until Friday May 13 or until all slots are filled, whichever is first (watch #crmidol on twitter for updates on that as it occurs). On May 13, should any slots be left, the remaining specific dates and times will be made publicly available and another final round of submissions for those remaining slots will occur from May 13 through May 20. After that the submissions will be closed.

Each submission will include the following:

  • Your company contact and named person contact information Two date and time specific slot requests. ONLY two. If your slots are not available, you’re out of luck until May 14 – and then you can resubmit to any time slots that are publicly announced as still available. Though there is no guarantee that there will be any available slots at that time. (see below for examples of how to submit the dates/times)
  • The category you feel you fit into – or if you don’t but think that you qualify – why.
  • A description of what the product is/the company is. Be persuasive here that you meet the criteria, not that you have a great product. This is merely a qualifying discussion. URLs cannot be used as substitutes for this description. The submission needs to be all inclusive. However, they can be used as supporting documentation.
  • The names of the three (3) referenceable customers – the company, the contact and the way to communicate with them – minimum of email and phone, please.
  • A statement that says that you meet the revenue requirement along the lines of “our company states truthfully that our revenues in our last fiscal year 2010 were under $12 million U.S”. OR you can state the actual number with the knowledge that the primary judges in each of the Americas and EMEA will treat it as under non-disclosure. But please be aware those designated primary judges below will see the actual figures if you choose to reveal them.
  • A statement that says, “if (you) make the finals, you are committed to making a 10 minute video for submission and public viewing as part of the conditions for entry.” Word it anyway you prefer but make the commitment clear.

If you are accepted, you’ll be notified privately but it will be posted that you’ve been accepted on the Twitter #crmidol stream. The time will only be sent to you privately. Just your acceptance will be posted. Please allow some time between your submission and the posting of it to the hashtag and your private notification, since we all still have to work for a living. clip_image002

If you don’t include everything specified in the rules for submission, it means automatic disqualification and you cannot resubmit.

The Demo

The demo has few rules. Just be prepared to a. explain your company; b. show your product – live please c. answer questions from the influencers/experts. Not much more than that. I’m sure many of you are experienced at this already so wed don’t have to tell you this, but just in case… A site for the demos with login etc. will be announced to the timeslot owners in early August.

The Video

The standards for the video will be mentioned to the finalists once they are named. To rest any unease, you won’t be required to spend lots of money to get it done. How much you spend and on what will be up to you as will the content and how you present it. We’ll issue guidelines when the time gets near, including how the video is going to be distributed for posting and voting.

The Judges

Here are the lists of all the judges. As you can see, we have what is likely to be the heaviest hitting list in the history of anything done in CRM when it comes to awards or competitions. Click on their names to get to their LinkedIn bios. They are in alphabetical order.

Primary Judges

The Americas

These five judges will handle the 40 entries for the Americas which consists of the United States, Canada, South and Central America. They will all be involved in the one hour reviews each of the days over the two weeks and will jointly sign off on each review which will be posted to multiple media sites. They will also solely choose the four finalists for the Americas.

EMEA

These four judges will handle the 20 entries from Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia etc. They will all be involved in the each of the 1 hour demos/discussions from Sept 5 through 9 and will write and jointly sign off on each review which will be posted to multiple media sites. They will also solely choose the three finalists for EMEA.

  • Laurence Buchanan – Vice President, CRM & Social CRM, EMEA, Capgemini
  • Silvana Buljan – Founder & Managing Director, Buljan & Partners
  • Paul Greenberg – see above
  • Mark Tamis – Social Business Strategist, NET-7

Mentors

This is an exciting part of CRM Idol 2011. Each of these fine human beings has volunteered a day of their time – two during the finals and one with the winners – to provide the benefit of their experience to the contestants. What they will do is noted by their name. This is an awesome idea that Anthony Lye actually cooked up. Each of these mentors has decades of experience in the software and venture capital world and is considered a leader in the CRM space. So if you make it to the finals, you have the benefit of their knowledge and their valuable time. Amazing.

  • Anthony Lye – Anthony will provide one day for the Americas finalists and one day for the EMEA finalists for consultation on how to best do the content for the contending videos and whatever other pertinent advice the finalists need. Anthony has had years of experience as a senior management person for enterprise CRM and a thought leader.
  • Joe Hughes – Joe will provide one day for the Americas finalists and one day for the EMEA finalists for consultation on how to best do the content for the contending videos and whatever other pertinent advice the finalists need. Joe has been a leader in the CRM space for as long as we can remember and one of the more foresighted when it comes to the value of Social CRM
  • Larry Augustin – This is a prize for the winner of EMEA and the winner of the Americas. Larry who has years of experience as an executive in the software space and has been a successful venture capitalist will work with the winner to prepare them for dealing with possible investors including doing a VC matching with the winners.

There will most likely be other mentors announced as the competition gets closer to the demo dates. We might try to make some mentors available to prepare you if you need them for the one hour demos but that’s still up in the air. We’ll keep you posted.

Extended Judges Panels

The Influencer Panel

The Vendor Panel

The Journalist Panel

Media Partners

You’ll note that we have 8 journalists on a panel of judges. Well, each of them represents a media partner that will be broadcasting the competition and posting the videos for voting in the finals for the popular vote. They are an awesome array of the most influential media sites in social media, CRM, and small business as well as local influencers in CRM in Latin America and Europe. They will be significant in the lives of the contestants, the finalists, and the winners giving each what may be an unprecedented breadth and depth of coverage. Their coverage will be supplemented by posts to the blogs and other sites that are owned by many of the judges so there will be significant reach for all 60 of the initial contenders. Each of these partners will be getting exclusives from the judges and hopefully some of the companies too so that we can add a quality of coverage that would enhance the value to the SMBs participating. in all areas – CRM, social and small business directly.

We expect to add more media partners as we continue on throughout the competition.

The current partners and links to their sites (in alphabetical order, like every list here):

The Prizes…So Far

These are the prizes as of launch today. There are several others in the works that will be announced as the contest rolls out.

All Finalists

All 7 finalists will get to choose one day of consulting from the list of Influencer consultants below. The order of choice will be based on the popular vote on the video which will be kept confidential but used for the choosing. There will be more consultants added to the list as contest moves forward.

The Americas and EMEA Winners

Each winner will get to choose four prizes from the list. Note – in the case where multiple prizes are being offered by a single vendor – the vendor counts as a single prize with all the items as part of that.

  • Accenture A full day workshop with CRM leaders in Accenture for possible partnership and/or possible investment.
  • Capgemini (for EMEA winners only) A half day workshop with Patrick James, Global VP CRM and Laurence Buchanan to explore joint go to market opportunities and help you refine and test your value proposition.
  • Social Media Today A blog post featuring the winner of the contest to run on both The Customer Collective and Social Media Today. A single blast to the Social Media Today opt-in list (approximately 50,000 names) which will conform to their minimum standards (valued at $10,500)
  • Microsoft 12 mos. of CRM Online Free for developing extensions to CRM, 12 mos. of Windows Azure Free for developing web-based portals and BI solutions, Access to the Office 365 Beta for building collaborative applications and services, Access to the BizSpark One program -a program designed to connect emerging businesses and their investors with a Microsoft advisor to help them identify unique opportunities and expand its business presence
  • SugarCRM Free 10 user subscription to SugarCRM Professional or Enterprise, Membership in the Sugar Exchange and free consulting on product integration with SugarCRM, CEO Larry Augustin, a successful venture capitalist in his own right, does a mentoring & VC matchmaking session with the winners
  • Brian Solis One hour internal webinar on how to use SCRM and social media to your advantage
  • Paul Greenberg One hour pro bono external webinar on a subject TBD for lead gen, mindshare, etc.
  • Ray Wang One hour pro bono external webinar on a subject TBD for lead gen, mindshare, etc.
  • Sameer Patel One hour pro bono external webinar on a subject TBD for lead gen, mindshare, etc.
  • Influencer Consulting– free strategic consulting for 1 day or 8 hours from a variety of judges (in person travel expenses to be covered by winners)

Esteban Kolsky (in person only)

Paul Greenberg (on phone or in person)

Denis Pombriant (on phone or in person)

Mark Tamis (on phone or in person)

Jesus Hoyos (on phone or in person)

Brent Leary (on phone or in person)

The Times, Dates, Hashtag and Email

Okay here’s the hardcore stuff:

Dates and Times Table for the Americas and EMEA

We’ve put together an easy little table with all the relevant dates and times that you’ll need as you progress through the competition.

Dates/Times

Americas

EMEA

Submission Dates

August 15-19; August 22-26

September 5-9

Submission Times

3pm ET; 4pm ET; 5pm ET; 6pm ET

3pm GMT; 4pm GMT; 5pm GMT; 6pm GMT

Finalist Video Submission Date

September 30

October 14

Winner Announcement

October 17

October 31

A Note or Two

A little bit of unfinished stuff that will sort itself out as time goes forward.

  • There will likely be a CRM Idol site (Joomla based) coming in the next month or so that will be an aggregate site for all the media outlets and streams. However, this remains a work in progress that’s still under discussion.
  • There will be more mentors and prizes added and possibly a judge or two.
  • For now ongoing news will be found at the twitter hashtag #crimidol.

In Closing

That’s about it. Now its time to bring it. First come, first serve. See you, maybe as the 1st ever CRM Idol, in Vegas, Hollywood. London or on the Social Web. Somewhere anyway.

CRM IDOL 2011 IS NOW OFFICIALLY UNDERWAY


No Comments »

Written on: 04-25-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel

This entry is filed under Event Reviews, Speaking.

Talking Collaboration on BlogTalk Radio

I did an interview on BlogTalkRadio today with the terrific Chris Coleman and Aparna Sharma who were nice enough to invite me on to their Radio Show.

BlogTalkRadio LogoChris and I talked about how social and collaborative concepts can power real business challenges and opportunities, examples of strategic alignment, the value of social analytics towards employee performance / HR measurement and realizing benefit during and at point of scale.

Thanks to Aparna for inviting me and to Chris for a fun chat.

And here is the recording:

Listen to internet radio with Collaboration Pizza on Blog Talk Radio


No Comments »

Written on: 04-14-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel

This entry is filed under Collaborative Organizations, Measurement and Analytics, Speaking.

Ha! The Case for Business Analytics in 5 minutes by L. Vaughan Spencer

Good ole Brit humor.

Hat Tip: Oliver Marks. Via The Economist.

1 Comment »

Written on: 04-04-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel

This entry is filed under Measurement and Analytics.

Displacement Politics

Switching cost, in a consumer sense, is defined as:

“The negative costs that a consumer incurs as a result of changing suppliers, brands or products. Although most prevalent switching costs are monetary in nature, there are also psychological, effort- and time-based switching costs.”

Also prevalent in the enterprise, it’s the cost of moving from an old system for a new system – more broadly, technology, content and data migration, operationalizing, change management and training costs to move people from system x to system y. Put together, the new system is expected to provide a positive net present value in an acceptable time period, or the new program and investment often becomes difficult to justify.

That’s the argument most organizations are publicly sensitive of when making investment decisions.

There’s another one though that runs counter to this. Meaning, the more the cost of the system to be replaced, the more difficult it is to get the owners of the system to agree to a replacement. And that’s due to Displacement Politics.

Unlike the public line in the previous case, this is the undercurrent that’s often in play.

Part of the reason Jack is a Sr. Director and not a Director is because the systems and business programs he owns needs a $24.23 million dollar budget. And with that budget and responsibility came a head count of 104. Lose the need for the budget (i.e the expensive systems and its support structure) and a domino effect ensures. Rapidly, the corner office, title, stature and salary levels risk going south.

Displacement Politics dictates that you keep the high costs in place to protect your position. And its amazing how folks will justify the need for keeping the older system in place with the most creative arguments (“functionality is too radical”, “platform challenges”, “security holes”, “Too busy; SAP upgrade coming” etc.).

It’s important to note that this is not really the system owners’ doing, in totality. The reality in many cases is that HR policy is often set up this way. And so it ends up being a conflict of emotions. Do the right thing or complicate your progression. Tough choices, really. To be fair, there are those that realize that getting behind programs that drive revenue and reduce cost and risk, pays off. And from a management perspective, seasoned CXOs see this emotional tussle coming from a mile away and take adequate measure early.

This is certainly not limited to social software enabled programs. Scores of excellent post have been written by the likes of Vinnie Mirchandani and Dennis Howlett  about the ballooning costs of software maintenance, yet tepid efforts to get off the spending treadmill by customers. There’s a buyer element to this issue, just a much as it’s a vendor created conundrum.

But in the context of this blog, as sponsors and champions of social and collaborative programs powered by enterprise social software, be very sensitive to how much weight you put on arguments such as “this is far cheaper than SharePoint” or “SaaS based collaboration lowers CAPX” arguments in the first few slides of your presentation deck. Get the right stakeholders on your side and a solid case for performance acceleration straightened out (the R element of ROI) with as much gusto as you have for the cost reduction argument. And make sure you have the support of a wide range of business and IT stakeholders on the matter of improving their business units performance outcomes.

That’s when there’s any hope of minimizing the under current effects of Displacement Politics because the focus is more on benefits and outcomes for the better part of the discussion.

So understand and account for the nature of your organizations Displacement Politics, early on.


5 Comments »

Written on: 04-01-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel

This entry is filed under Collaborative Organizations.

Jive , Alfresco and SolutionSet turn Content into a Social Object

Over a year ago I wrote about Why ECM is critical to your Enterprise 2.0 Execution Plan. I wrote then about the pitfalls of closed content management processes:

If you’re a large organization using enterprise content management systems (ECM), chances are that its powering images, documents and records management, and web content. These systems enforce roles, workflows, access control and versioning to enable the creation, management and dissemination of media assets.

What this means is that from the very beginning of a given business activity, a few people control the creation of information that employees, customers, partners and suppliers rely on to move your business forward. Like it or not, this puts the responsibility/power to influence business performance in the hands of a few, with little input from other unknown experts, or consumers of this data. You only find out how effective the content turned out to be once its consumed (and long after you can optimize).

I had also reached out to Billy Cripe, then a Director in Oracles Enterprise 2.0 group and now a VP at Fishbowl Solutions. We identified overarching inefficiencies in Content Management where social and collaborative concepts can help:

Silo

Now its 2011 and as we see more business challenges emerge, there’s more to be said about the inefficiency of excessively locking down the creation, management and dissemination of content. To summarize:

Context: “One man’s food is another man’s poison”. A central taxonomy can never account for varied and dynamic usage scenarios of each digital asset. Every asset has a different purpose for, say, a sales, marketing, product management and service professional. When you let content flow through social and collaborative metaphors, its amazing how each of us can fulfill our unique consumption use cases.

Data Association: Systems Integration to associate events and data from ERP/CRM/SCM systems to ECM content is extremely expensive and static. You get IT to make a customization and then go back to the end of the line when you need another one. As a result we have limited system scaling to meet evolving business requirements. In contrast, integrating people does bring scale and can serve as a far more effective glue between events that need action and content/documents/digital assets that can help you take an optimal course of action.

Enterprise Search: Know anyone working at a large company that loves their enterprise search functionality? Yeah, me neither. It’s time we give people a shot at recommending the right content and documents. For that we need a social layer that sits atop enterprise content management to offer contextual meta data.

The solution still remains the same: Infuse Content and Document Management with Social and Collaborative approaches to get the best minds to contribute, vet, validate and recommend digital assets in the context of varied business activities.

Microsoft SharePoint has seen a majority of the social platform integration effort, thus far. Oracle has its own content, portal and collaboration components systematically meshed together. And I have other examples in my previous post.

This morning Jive Software, Alfresco Software, and SolutionSet announced that they have collaborated to turn content, documents and digital assets into social objects. Jive offers the social components, Alfresco does the Content Management heavy lifting, and SolutionSet, (the most experienced social software SI you’ve likely never heard of) engineered the connecter that makes this happen. This integration enables bi-directional content creation, editing and management. Per Matt Tucker, CTO and founder of Jive:

“Alfresco provides a proven enterprise content management system. Jive taps into the Alfresco system to ‘socialize’ the content, facilitate collaboration, and make it available in the activity stream. Access and interaction with Alfresco content becomes seamless in Jive. This makes content management more searchable, ratable, likable, commentable, and most importantly, more social.”

I don’t generally cover software announcements on this blog but when I see an attempt to combine content, process and people in an effort to contextualize work (as opposed to social for social’s sake), I consider it a meaningful effort towards performance acceleration – something I do write a lot about.

The devil is in the details when it comes to making two systems talk to each other. But what’s neat is that this connector is not about just adding comments and ratings to documents. It proposes to enable broad collaboration when it comes to the creation, validation or approval of content and digital assets.

We see a growing need for this in our work: Talk to most executives at large organizations and they will quietly admit that content creation budgets have become a “black hole” over the last decade. What’s worse, it’s extremely challenging to find a way to get off the spending treadmill or know which efforts truly provide value. Such integration can now federate the creation and uses of content to reduce significant risk, give you crowd sourced insight into top performing assets, and promote new applicability for a very expensive line item in the operating budget of many many large organizations.

For more, see this post by Barb Mosher on CMS Wire and from Tim Ross, GM at SolutionSet Digital.

Kudos to all involved.


5 Comments »

Written on: 03-29-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel

This entry is filed under Collaborative Organizations, Enterprise and Social Sofware.

Social Software: Midlife Crisis vs. Kid in a Suit

This morning I was reading some stuff from SAP StreamWork that provided a rundown of integration partners that its chosen to work with: Doodle, MindMeister, CS Odessa, Evernote, Altassian. And others such as Google Apps and Scribd.

I wonder if ~80% of the Fortune 500, SAPs customer base, will get these relationships.

I said to Todd Morrison at Tech Target a few weeks ago:

“I’ve always wondered why Streamworks is focused on seemingly lightweight offerings that most of its large enterprise customers don’t generally adopt,” said Sameer Patel, an analyst with The Sovos Group who follows social media applications.

Still, Patel credited SAP for its decision to incorporate Atlassian, which he said has “deep tentacles” inside many large software organizations. Activities like brainstorming and collaboration are important parts of decision making, he added.

Net net: Trying to be relevant / hip / cool, SAP is looking to get its mojo back in its old age.

Contrast this with what start up/ pure play social software vendors such as Jive, SocialText, NewsGator, Moxie, etc., often see:

As they get beyond the initial deployments that are general purpose in nature, their customers (and ours) are increasingly asking for a plethora of integration points for all sorts of data sources sitting inside mammoth ECM, ERP, BI and CRM systems. All in an effort to make social interaction, be that inside communities or on an activity stream, contextually richer.

Some social and collaboration vendors such as Socialcast, Qontext, SimplyBox (and others quietly in beta) are even creating engagement modules that sit right inside the system of record where critical processes are completed. Others provide the conversational glue between traditional call centers that deals with the external world and static employee intranets.

Net Net: The smaller guys are working on growing up.

I’m not criticizing either move. To be fair, SAP announced support for OpenSocial which re-affirms its commitment to nurturing the developer ecosystem and by all respected accounts, the (quite social) Sales On Demand product is the bees knees. In turn, the younger/startup software vendors have some work do to to blend process and social together – a fact that most will readily admit as they work very hard to make happen.

But I couldn’t help feel like we have one camp that’s having a mid life crisis and another that’s trying to muscle in on an adult conversation.

I found it entertaining. Life in the enterprise world would be a tad bit boring without either of these cases. That’s all there is to it : – )

5 Comments »

Written on: 03-15-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel

This entry is filed under Enterprise and Social Sofware.

Know your Nucleus

Every organization has a nucleus. The single core competency around which the ecosystem revolves. Often tied to an organizations mission statement, this is the one area of the organization that everyone rallies around, that is the first line item in the ops review, and where the beefiest budgets exist. The spotlight shines here.

Some examples….

  • Intel is known for engineering complex chips – its R&D and Supplier Management that keeps its ahead of its competitors
  • At Bloomberg, every single employee is compensated on sales. Every sales reps progress to quota is openly published
  • At Walmart, its cost cutting to improve operational efficiency and pass savings to customers
  • Nike is all about R&D and Brand
  • Zappos rules its market via insane customer service.
  • Even Cisco, a networking gear manufacturer, believes that it’s the connections it makes that’s more powerful than the software and hardware that enables it.

You get my point.

Enterprise Social initiatives are a tough one because they often get forced fit to problems. The business and technology landscape for most functional areas are clear: Sales and Marketing look to the best thinking in CRM, Procurement looks to understand how to optimize with supply chain management solutions. Even e-commerce, the love child of broadband and the dot com boom landed in the hands of revenue generating functions.

Not the case when it comes to enterprise social and collaborative efforts. We often tend to think that HR or Employee Comms or IT needs to control this if we want the maximum number of users to be well…..social. Or because they have a birds eye view of the employee base.

Hardly a good business objective if you think about it. All you often get are more people who don’t know why they should leave their ERP, CRM, CMS, BI screens to come to the shiny new digital water cooler.

Yes, the more people on your enterprise social network, the better. That’s how you get the best minds who know the end customers needs (customers themselves, service agents, partners and sales and marketing) to talk to those who know all the ingredients that go into your products (employees, suppliers, logistics). And multiple constituencies need to be involved, kept abreast, asked for communication assist and of course active participation.

But those areas, whilst critical to success over time, may not represent where the energy of the organization lies during the 9-5 hustle.

No refuting the fact that the more people participating the better, and that you need a business roadmap and a platform that goes wide and can accommodate planned and unplanned network effects. And no doubt, IT, HR and Employee comms can be instrumental in the eventual execution. If done correctly, these programs will become utilities, ultimately.

But know whether that’s where you really need to start to build a healthy, purpose driven collaborative fabric. Avoid hype around nebulous end goals such as engagement and productivity and you’ll ensure that you don’t fall on the wrong side of this argument.

Instead, identify the set of activities (and surround your self with the people and expertise that know enough to enrichen the business activity) that are most central to keeping your competitors at bay and will make sure you’re thumping your chest during the next earnings call. And build from there.

Know your nucleus.


6 Comments »

Written on: 03-02-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel

This entry is filed under Collaborative HR Performance, Collaborative Organizations.