Talking 21st Century Collaborative Enterprises at KMWorld 2011

Next week brings the annual KMWorld Conference in Washington DC. Jane Dysart and Hugh McKellar - the conference chairs have a stellar line up of speakers including household names in Enterprise 2.0 and Social Business such as Stan Garfield of Deloitte, Bill Ives of Darwin Ecosystem, Rob Koplowitz of Forrester Research, Claude Malaison of Emergence Web and Thomas Vanderwal of InfoCloud Solutions.

The topics include Socializing Knowledge Management, KM Metrics, Beyond Enterprise 2.0 and more.

 

For my part, I will be talking about the business case for 21st Century Collaborative Enterprises and why its critical to how we market, sell, support and innovate for today’s increasingly social and vocal prospect and customer. This is a keynote I did early on to US and European audiences that were focused on Enterprise 2.0 and Social Business. Jane Dysart, the conference co-chair at KMWord was kind enough to ask me to bring this discussion to the Knowledge Management Community.

Here is the presentation:

 

If you are at the event, come say hi.

 

 

 

2 Comments »

Written on: 10-27-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel

This entry is filed under Speaking.

TideMark: Bringing Collaborative Performance to an EPM Problem near you.

Lets cut to the chase: The business intelligence we rely on as enterprises to perform better can suck at times. I remember a famous dot com era business systems accomplishment that was touted up and down silicon valley. I paraphrase but it went something like this: “Cisco has the ability to do a virtual close on its books every night. That’s real time IT enabled management”. Well, fat lot of good that did with respect to anticipating the coming economic nosedive and preparing accordingly. Just like everyone else, Cisco stock fell from a high of about $80/share to under 20 bucks. This isn’t a ding against Cisco. Many organizations did the best they could to be operationally efficient with the tools and process thinking available at the time.

Our ability to track, forecast, measure, analyze and then tune or change course has been a wild west effort for a long time. For a number of primary reasons:

1. The intelligence we need is often in the wrong hands. By being top loaded primarily for the management ranks, we still faced the same down stream do-something-about-it execution risk.

2. Rolex watch style exclusivity for the chosen few that monitor as opposed to those that have the skill and responsibility to act and course-correct.

3. Almost zero ability to federate tough problems and let the best minds even get wind of the problem, let alone contribute to solving it.

4. And finally, business at the speed of PC access that just doesn’t cut it, especially today.

It’s as much a people and a design problem as it is a technology feat. But as I’ve said numerous times, it’s a hellava lot easier when the technology plays nice. Last week I had the opportunity to see some new enterprise performance management technology from TideMark that brings a fresh approach to an age old business problem: Really complex and expensive technology that produces reports and charts that few and sometimes the wrong people inside organizations read and react to.

Ben Horowitz of Andreessen Horowitz (investors in TideMark) characterizes the problem in a different way but it captures the essence of the fundamental change in how we need to look at the health of our businesses:

“Beyond these platform advantages, Tidemark changes the nature of data analytics by ditching the two fundamental and problematic questions on which the existing industry is based:

  • What data do I have?
  • What reports do I want?

The trouble with these questions is that a) it is highly unlikely that you’ve gathered all of the relevant data in the right schema and format prior to needing it, b) businesses are not best represented in reports and c) the reports generally say very little that’s interesting about the future. “

I dont cover software releases often here but this one is different. Why? Because it speaks to what you’ve read here since 2009: How performance acceleration comes from leveraging the best of structured data and insight on one had, and manipulation smarts of our employees, our customers and our partners. All in the context of a business problem or an opportunity.  TideMark strives to do just this. By leveraging the efficiency and agility of the cloud and contextual collaboration, and in harmony with more current data sets that include not just critical internal data in your business systems but also pubic and public social data, they want to give you a more holistic answer to critical business questions. Not after the fact but when there is time to course correct.

TideMark seems to come at the problem with very promising elements. See what Dennis Howlett has to say about the state of financial insight, and Larry Dignan‘s take on the intricacies of Enterprise Performance Management. I distill down the value that TideMark brings, to three big elements:

1. Analytics in the hands of those that can DO something about the insight.

TideMark is designed as much for mahogany row as it is for those on the line managing critical execution and decision-making tasks. A huge distinction as compared to traditional reporting and metrics data which is limited to more senior people. Ultimately, its the store manager at Starbucks, the Factory Planner in the warehouse, and the UPS driver that can tell you how likely you are to meeting business objectives. And more important, fix the problems that can derail a business plan.

2. Collaboration at the point of context.

It fascinates me how we’ve lived such unnecessarily risky lives as business managers by limiting entire processes to a few chosen few that we think are the best people for the job, from concept to finish. The marketing expert can’t easily reach out to a product manager, the sales rep doesn’t even know who designed the products they sell. By enabling collaboration between anointed experts and the rest of the organization, we can plan and predict far more effectively. To do that we need to enable collaboration at the right points in our data consoles and our workflows. Its early days and TideMark has ways to go to enable silo-free collaboration but what is important is that they recognize the pivotal role of collaboration, enough to include it in version one. This how enterprise systems need to be built in my opinion and they have so, from the get go.

3. Designing for today’s dataset.

The public web gives you more unfiltered data on what your customers really think than we’ve ever had in the history of marketing. But to date, our collection and understanding of this data has been through brokers and manipulators of this information, and at latency levels that would just never work today (e.g. 4 months for a competitive assessment from your favorite management consultancy). Any business intelligence and performance management tool today needs to be able to take in first hand data and create insight that sits alongside what our ERP applications can tell us. That’s a true amalgamation of not just what we think about our businesses but what our customers and partners objectively think as well. Tidemark proposes to account for this holistic view.

Beyond this, they have the other elements of what makes a 21st century business application relevant, let alone useful.  Device-first design to get you analytics and performance data that cannot wait till you get back to your desktop. And native integration into existing systems such as SAP and Oracle that house underlying data.

The devil is in the details but this is clear: This fight is going to be one that’s fought with knuckle-dusters. Incumbent providers such as SAP, Oracle and others have cloud based BI and EPM solutions, complete with tablet consumption abilities and an established distribution channel to boot. And we’ve already seen cloud based BI such as Lucid Era fail to get off the ground indicating that this isn’t simple. But TideMark seems to have thought through the simple elements of what makes performance management well…perform: be available where decisions need to be optimized and committed, understand the needs of public and private raw intelligence, and finally – democratize collaborative decision facilitation to get the best possible insight.

Dennis has this right. It’s early days but TideMark has the opportunity to fill the glaring void in the emerging ‘Cloud Cabal’. Salesforce.com offers CRM, the underlying force.com platform and the social layer in Chatter; Workday currently offers HCM and Financials and pipes data into and out of Chatter; Kenandy brings Supply Chain/MRP to Force.com subscribers. And now TideMark offers EPM with ready hooks into Workday.

This is one to watch.

 

No Comments »

Written on: 10-20-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel

This entry is filed under Collaborative Business Intelligence, Collaborative Organizations, Enterprise and Social Sofware, Measurement and Analytics, Mobile Enterprise.

Social and Collaborative Business: My Favorite Reads. (weekly)

  • Prashanth Padmanabhan has a thought proviking post up on why there will never be one super [employee] profile in the enterprise. I understand his issues with this but I think its important to decouple sources of employee intelligence and the profile itself. I fully agree that we have to have systems engage and share data but still, as we start to understand the implicit and explicit elements of what makes a complete profile (i recently posted here on this topic), we need to start to bring the right information together in one place. I agree with Prashanth that we need to let employees maintain their profile but I think thats a rat hole for the most part. When is the last time you updated MyYahoo or Google profiles? As bad as HR might be at some orgs when it comes to updating employee data, employees might be no better.

    We need implicit data to feed a profile to truly get a sense of what each employee brings to the table – based on not just what she thinks she knows, but her work and how the community feels about it. Great post by Prashanth. 

    tags: blog

  • “The person with the largest activity in the microblogging tool may not be the real expert you’re trying to find.”
    ————-
    One of the big issues in enterprise social software deployments is participation and at a root cause level, participatory intent. Once we do infact start to pay attention to the context the exists inside other participants heads, inside our content bases and finally in our business process apps, were still going to have to do a good job of figuring out the input we ultimately rely on to make good business decisions  - be those on customer intelligence, on a feature in a product roadmap, who to give a raise to, and some day, what markets to enter. 
    I havent seen what spreadd is up to but I liked the focus they illustrate in this post and it tends to this coming problem once we begin to optimize the use of enterprise social concepts.

    tags: blog

  • Some great comments by the likes of Adina Levin, Sig Rinde and Jon Reed (JonERP) on what mature incentive models need to look like to have staying power in the enterprise. We risk making some of the same tactical ‘solution looking for a problem to solve’ mistakes as we often make with enterprise social computing. See what some of my really smart industry colleagues have to say. 

    tags: blog

  • “Some of the fervor of the Social Media crowd sounds like it’s led by CRM Savonarola. And it sounds like old school these days to talk about antiquated interfaces and poor process design and inadequate knowledge management systems. Yet for the majority of organizations, there is still a lot of work to be done to engineer great customer experiences that involves the basics.”

    Michael Maoz is on point about fixing customer service first and objectively understating where social fits in the larger picture. i had my own experience with Dell and Microsoft on a similar topic (http://ow.ly/6SrLR) where basic CRM was broken and no amount of peppering social would make difference. This is a critical topic especially as the volume levels on social as a cure all for business continues to go up. 

    tags: blog

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.


No Comments »

Written on: 10-15-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel

This entry is filed under Weekly Links.

PwC: Enterprise Success with Emerging Social Technology #socbiz

As a follow up to this post commenting on PriceWaterHouse Coopers (PwC) extensive report on Social and Collaborative Business, PwC just published the conversation we had a few months ago. We talked about the following:

  • Recent challenges companies have been facing on the collaboration front
  • The current generation of tools and how they’re moving toward that goal and advantages/ disadvantages / inhibitors of different approaches
  • Systemic inefficiencies
  • And in the midst of all of this, the changing role of Identity (more on this subject, here)

You can find the whole interview on PwC.com, here.

 

 

No Comments »

Written on: 10-10-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel

This entry is filed under Collaborative Organizations, Enterprise and Social Sofware, Measurement and Analytics, Speaking.

Social and Collaborative Business: My Favorite Reads. (weekly)

  • “What people failed to see regarding the Dell or Comcast success stories in the early social media days, is the amount of work that went on behind Twitter, Facebook, and blogs. The true transformation of these businesses what not in taking to social network, but instead building the back end to start fixing the problems that created negative experiences in the first place. In my list above, I mention the power of stories, and both Dell and Comcast utilized these online conversations or stories to help drive improvements. I am sure both companies will admit that this is an ongoing process and that wholesale change does take time.”

    ——————————–

    Frank Eliason nails it in a way that few can. It’s shocking how many orgs try to front load ‘social media’ in the same way that they have front loaded marketing, sales and support for decades. IMO, the customer is systematically disinter-mediating your marketing department more and more every day. They get the basics from the social web, and then they want to talk to the experts we hide inside cubes, who designed and built those great products. To get those brains infront of customers and prospects, you need this back end that Frank describes. And that comes from a well managed engagement channel operation but also from linking the rest of your employee base. The tools exist; the mindset now needs to catch up.

    tags: blog

 


No Comments »

Written on: 10-08-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel

This entry is filed under Weekly Links.

Oracle OpenWorld: Fifteen Minutes with Mark Hurd.

I spent fifteen minutes with Oracle’s President, Mark Hurd, along with Sudhir Chowdhary from the Financial Express yesterday at Oracle OpenWorld 2011.  These were the big take aways from our conversation:

1. Collaboration Moving Front and Center

Oracle seems to have rationalized its’ investments in the areas of content and collaboration technology and has come to terms with the idea that collaboration needs to be front and center in its’ portfolio offering. I asked Mark how he rationalized not catering to the other 80 odd percent of the average employees’ daily time that isn’t spent in one of Oracles’ ERP/CRM and other process apps in any integrated way. At a previous meeting with Oracle’s executive team earlier this year, it was clear that customers do have collaboration on their minds. And earlier yesterday, Anthony Lye, SVP, CRM, also confirmed that the subject of activity streams will be broached during the CRM keynotes. Mark responded with “I absolutely agree and stay tuned – there’s an announcement coming over the next 48 hours on collaboration”. Across these conversations what’s clear to me is this: Oracle will be declaring its intentions in both traditional collaboration and also some of the newer flavors characterized by enterprise social networking and activity streams.

We’r seeing a growing need for this in the market as collaboration needs mature and become more sophisticated beyond general purpose sharing. And so I have high hopes for a fitting response to collaboration that’s cognizant of process. Oracle is also one of the few companies that can, in principle, get this right. Given what I saw of Fusion’s Rich Identity features last year, it doesn’t seem like a stretch to expect that Oracle will infuse findability and collaboration into its overall business systems offering. So consider this a heads up for you fellow Enterprise 2.0 and Social Business gear heads out there. Fingers crossed that it isn’t just silo’d collaboration that ignores the needed context hidden inside the various business systems it offers.

2. Catering to the Exa-customer’s Cloud vs On-premise Needs.

Exalogic, Exadata, Exalytics. It’s all about the mammoth and gynormous here. Mark’s assessment is that Oracles’ primary customer base will look for a staged move to the cloud, if at all. In the way that it was described by Mark, the logic was this: large companies expanding to new regional markets may choose to go cloud and leave the mother ship on-premise. They may change that configuration at a later time and go all cloud, or extend cloud solutions to front end back end installations.   Oracle proposes to offer the needed flexibility using one code base as customers move to all cloud or partial cloud…or never cloud.

The message was that from a customer stand point, Oracle is ready if and when the customer is. An alternate interpretation of this would be the following: stretch out the license and maintenance revenue model of on-premise software for as long as the customer is willing / needs to keep an on premise foot print. Be ready with a plan B if the customer decides to shop its technology needs and considers cloud based systems a viable option.

3. On the new crop of Competition:

It seems as if Oracle finally has a game plan to play both offense and defense with cloud based providers. To be clear, no names were named but its easy to connect the dots and see that companies such as Workday and Salesforce.com were reference points. The market view presented by Mark was this:

  • Newer cloud based offerings already have an older code base compared to Oracles’ OnDemand line.
  • They don’t currently have the vertical specialty that Oracle’s customers look for.
  • They don’t have the safe pair of hands /maturity of Oracle.
  • They don’t have the integrated suite of all ERP applications.
  • And finally, Oracle has the kind of scale of operations that’s needed to carpet bomb the large company buyer landscape with an OnDemand value proposition.

Looked at in totality, this a very different message from the previous points of view that went from the cloud isn’t new to the cloud exists but it’s best in a box. Clearly there was a recognition that Oracle’s market is in fact considering alternate solutions that don’t only come from the likes of SAP. And so it’s game on, from Oracle’s stand-point.

So there you go. I’m looking forward to seeing how this all comes to fruition over the next couple of days….

Comments rolling in on Google Plus, here.

Image Credit: Mike Maloney

1 Comment »

Written on: 10-04-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel

This entry is filed under Collaborative Organizations, Enterprise and Social Sofware, Event Reviews, SaaS and Cloud.

TIBCO’s Tibbr: Inching Towards Great.

Few organizations providing enterprise social software have a process and integration DNA, as does TIBCO Software. The last of the independents in the enterprise integration game, TIBCO supports some of the most gnarly systems integration efforts at some of the best known organizations in the world. For these reasons, I went to TUCON 2011, TIBCO’s Annual Customer Conference to see what customers have to say about Tibbr, TIBCOs enterprise social software offering.

For starters, if you need a primer on what Tibbr set out to do, the best place to start is this post by my esteemed industry colleague, Ross Dawson.

My main take aways….

Injecting Context into the Collaboration workflow: First off, I do have a bias when it comes to different strands of collaboration and I lean towards the kind the calls for injecting the needed business context that makes collaboration purposeful. I’ve been writing about this since 2009 and increasingly, scores of examples exist that show tepid or even failed social/collaboration uptake at large organizations due to the fact that context around collaboration was just not apparent.

Tibbr has drawn on its integration heritage to ensure that meaningful events can be drawn in from an organizations BI, CRM and other Business Applications that provide the needed context that often invokes collaboration in the first place. As much as we might tend to think that the business systems market has consolidated around SAP and Oracle, any one that has worked in large organizations knows that scores of other third party and custom tools also hold critical data and content. When you consider customer and partner systems that you don’t control, this gets even more complex. TIBCO provides integration points to well over 140 apps as Ross alludes to in his post and so the context pool that Tibbr has to draw from is a mammoth kitchen sink of apps that big industry relies on, today. That, along with its ability to let end users follow people and subjects is powerful in theory and if messaged and executed correctly, powerful in practice as well.  The product design and road-map reflects this in spades.

Customer Traction: MGM, KPMG and Macy’s, amongst others, is a solid list of reference-able client names that any social software company would grab with two hands. What’s particularity impressive to me is that these customers trusted a plumber with the interior design of their living room. Honestly, I would have a hard time doing that, unless the story convincingly re-set my expectations on why the underlying infrastructure and the collaboration experience complement each other. And TIBCO seem to be convincing customers that this trifecta of people, applications and subjects, matters. KPMG, the giant services firm is looking to connect SharePoint, Work-flow Applications, SAP Practice Management and Outlook in a way where Tibbr provides the single command and control center. CargoSmart, a shipping concern that helps over 22,000 customers streamline its shipping operations and lower costs uses Tibbr to manage thousands of exceptions by invoking collaboration between the best minds. My kind of social business, if you know what I mean.

Net, net, the product itself is drawing on TIBCOs overall strengths to differentiate its offering in a very crowded enterprise social software market, and big customers are giving them a shot at powering their collaborative needs.

 

More needs to be done…

To be honest, I hold TIBCO to a high standard when it comes to an enterprise social offering because I believe the opportunity for them can be unique. A few reasons why:

- TIBCO knows more about the intricacies of getting the right information to the right people at the right time, and from the right systems, than most technology providers.

- Every conceivable business activity of an organization is completed by some combination of right process on one hand, and unstructured conversation, knowledge leverage and content access on the other. Via its integration and BPM products, TIBCO also has a clear appreciation for how much time the average employee spends in structured work-flow and process activities. By extension, it also aware of the white spaces that exist outside of that workflow, and the daily scramble to find people and information outside of those work-flows to effectively complete the a given business activity.

- At a holistic, market level, a clear appreciation of the needs and expectations of those organizations that decide on technology investment based on hard numbers and who wouldn’t be likely consider ‘becoming social,…..just ’cause’.

- And finally, at a industry level, TIBCO has a firm understanding of the market pressures faced in massive industries such as Financial Services, Telco and Healthcare – some of its largest verticals.

Against this backdrop, I was hoping to see more contextual collaboration customer examples and market messaging at a product level that was tied to better business outcomes that TIBCO knows so much about.  My sense was that there was heavier focus on some of the more general purpose productivity metrics that we’ve seen for years and that ultimately will be hard to use as proof points that a larger target market will be willing to bite into.

As Dennis Howlett and I discussed in this JD-OD.com video, the vision as laid out by Vivek is solid and the product itself has the goods. Together this reflects TIBCOs legacy in solving the most gnarly business problems for some of the most mission critical systems on the planet. TIBCO just needs to ensure that on the ground, they stay focused on solving business tasks with the careful injection of collaboration where it makes sense. That is the language the even the most pig headed social software skeptic will at least understand. And given its legacy and what Tibbr can deliver, TIBCO has the currency to credibly spark this conversation.

Collaboration isn’t all about process of course and the team has a solid focus (and a growing stable of experts) on community building to help customers get off the ground. But between product vision and associated product chops at one end, and community uptake at the last mile of execution sits the translation of the business benefit of collaboration that TIBCO needs to communicate and help its customers succeed with. Those business problems that live across squeaky supply chains, daily customer exception handling, not so repeatable order to cash processes, cobwebbed BI data that mostly goes unused, and the like. That’s where a significantly large untapped market sits that includes both organizations that attempted collaboration at a grass roots level but never took it seriously, or the uninitiated that never got the a-ha moment to begin with.

Closing thoughts….

One of the things I’ve repeatedly said in the context of why we need engagement platform layered across our silo’d organizations goes something like this:

For the last 2 decades we’ve spent ungodly amounts of time and even more money trying to integrate systems. Its expensive in a time when we don’t have discretionary dollars. It can be slow in the face of changing latency expectations of our customers on how we engage and collaborate to build products and service them. And it’s rigid in that its an absolute design in a world where our information, exceptions, data and content consumption needs are becoming extremely fluid and unpredictable. And it certainly shows its age in a world that’s going to look a lot more like the Two Second Advantage that CEO Vivek Ranadive describes.

Why do I hold TIBCO to a higher standard? Its because I truly believe that the world of integration, as we’ve known it, is going to be turned on its head over the next decade. It’s going to slowly move from today’s hard coded systems integration down in the bowels of the enterprise stack, to also include people integration at the last mile where instead of relying only on IT to perfectly integrate systems, we’re going to find that integrating and connecting people can be a more practical, cost efficient and fluid design. One where answers can flow from a) peoples brains and b) their knowledge of where critical data and insight lies across our fragmented global systems footprint. And few organizations can agnostically appreciate how big this problem and opportunity is as TIBCO can. And so the opportunity to lead this coming business design change is their’s to lose.

Its important to keep in mind that Tibbr in its current incarnation is barely 9 months young. But first impressions are lasting impressions and I hope that TIBCO gets this right as customers experience the product for the first time. The corporate vision is on point. Unlike many we’ve seen, Tibbr the product isn’t another example of vaporware that’s miles away from growing into its stated vision. Now they need to get the follow-through right so customers understand where Tibbr is a slam dunk enabler of hard business efficiency. Most social software vendors have caught on to this en masse – many of the big platforms are melding process, data, third party information and even bi-directional updates into and out of their social streams via connectors, APIs and AppStores.

So the time is now to communicate the business activity benefit of collaboration and compete on that distinct yet for-a-limited-time-only advantage.

 

——————————-

For some of the best content on the event, take a look at what Sandy KemsleyVinnie Mirchandani and this discussion between Vivek Ranadive, Dennis Howlett and Vinnie.

No Comments »

Written on: 10-03-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel

This entry is filed under Enterprise and Social Sofware, Event Reviews.