Marketing your Marketing

Chalk this up to another example of why Marketing STILL doesn’t get social.

Social Times reports that the way to get more “Likes” on Facebook is to offer coupons to satiate the what’s-in-it-for-me hunger of an increasingly discriminating social networker.

This might well be that moment in social media marketing history when we look back and say – “what were we thinking??”

I quote:

A recent survey conducted by Ad Age/Ipsos Observer finds that coupons are the number one reason consumers “like” brands on Facebook.

We’ve all seen the popularity of daily deal sites like Groupon, but it turns out that good ol’ retail coupons are a great incentive for Faebook users to “like” a business page. The findings of the survey make sense: Facebook users are not typically willing to share their information and their network with just anyone, but it seems they’re more willing to do so if they get something in return

Basically, entice your visitors to ‘Like’ your business page by throwing them a discount coupon.

Look, I’m a big believer in in-bound marketing on the social web, done right. I’ve gained tremendously from it in my own work. It’s opened gigantic doors for me to communicate and sell the promise of social and collaborative business as a way to accelerate performance. But increasingly there’s data emerging about the hype that is social media marketing from a lead generation standpoint. And this kind of stuff just adds to the exuberance.

I never thought I would do a whole post on a single social networking gesture but this is about the larger issue of not getting sucked into the social vortex without careful thought and resource implications.

A ‘Like’, simply, is designed to imply that I like your product. In marketing lingo, that is supposed to mean that I’m at minimum an unqualified interested party, and sends a message back that I might be a candidate to move up the engagement funnel or spiral or what have you. And ultimately towards a pre-defined call-to-action.

Throw in a coupon and you’re playing with allegiances now. Sure, your ‘Likes’ will go up but does that really translate to likes? Or was it just for the coupon? Seems like nothing’s lost but is it worth the time of your marketing and sales teams to deal with the scores of follow-ups? This looks like a knock off of trade show marketing where we are duped into believing that 1000 interested prospects came to our booth where in reality 700 just wanted to drop their business card in the till for a chance to win an iPad2.

In traditional marketing this may fly as the cost and effort to send out a 1000 follow up emails is minimal. To do in-bound marketing right, you need to engage and the manual nature of this gets really expensive when you do more enticing to attract unqualified buyers. That ends up in your organization topping off marketing with even more marketing.

Get off the treadmill. Make sure you’re not marketing your marketing.

 

Written on: 11-23-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel · 14 Comments »

This entry is filed under Customer Interaction and SocialCRM, Measurement and Analytics, Social Media. Connect on .

  • http://twitter.com/rawn Rawn Shah

    Interestingly enough, we found the same thing in an IBV study on “From social media to Social CRM” part 1 — page 9. It shows an interesting mismatch between how customers rank what they want and how businesses rank what they think customers want. 

    http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/thoughtleadership/crm.html

    Discounts & Purchases top the customer side, but at the bottom of the vendor side. Vendors/businesses think customers most want to learn about new products and get general information.  

  • http://www.twitter.com/sameerpatel Sameer Patel

    That was a great report. 
    I’m all for coupons and discounts to get interest up in a product. But this is a case of using a coupon to get a click on a “Like”. At some point – a watchful CMO or any CFO will get wind of this and call BS. 

  • http://twitter.com/rawn Rawn Shah

    Yes, you went a level deeper: they’re now couponing a marketing tactic which seems strange to me. On the other hand, perhaps they’re imagining social capital value in having lots of likes or generating a fan base. 

    Not sure I understand why that needs a coupon. They should save it for something beyond just getting numbers.

  • http://martijnlinssen.com Martijn Linssen

    It wasn’t going to be long before the numbers’ game was going to move from followers to fans and then to likes

    I certainly would do this were I a marketeer, and shout out in a few months that we have the most likes, or best likes:products_sold ratio, or whatnot – but I’d do it a lot, lot more inconspicuous than this

    Let’s face it: the majority of marketing is tricking somebody into something – or am I being cynical now?

  • http://www.twitter.com/sameerpatel Sameer Patel

    Thanks Martijn.
    I don’t have a problem with ‘Likes’ as a gesture, or one that marketing pays attention to. At the awareness and education stages, theres lots of value here and its the first step towards starting engagement.Just that when you are offering coupons to push Likes, the metrics start to get really squishy to some degree and you better be ready to scale  re: engaging with a wide, unqualified segment.

  • http://www.twitter.com/sameerpatel Sameer Patel

    Exactly. I get the need for marketing metrics and like it or not, thats how people are goaled. I just wonder if were mixing what done at the awareness and education stages with tactics that work at the qualified level. 
    The other way to look at it is that were increasingly borrowing  from marketing 1.0 tactics which won’t scale on the social web. 

  • Billy Cripe

    You hit it Sameer. Likes (or fans, followers etc) are not an end in themselves. They may be good signals of reach and responsiveness or even interest. But trading likes for coupons is silly if there is no way to close the loop.

    There is a great academic study looking at twitter that I tweeted yesterday. It’s about how the quantity of followers one has does not translate into influence. I think the same applies to Facebook likes.

  • http://www.twitter.com/sameerpatel Sameer Patel

    Yeah. The ‘Like’ gesture has grown on me, I have to admit. Just needs to be used and translated in a responsible way. :)  

  • Aviral Singh

    Interesting! Is this also about the incentive structure?  Are the people conducting the marketing (internal or external resources) given targets for these “likes”?  That would be…

  • Pingback: How Do You Market Cheap Socially? « SmoothSpan Blog

  • Bob Warfield

    Sameer, on this I have to agree to disagree.  When a company is in the business of selling “Cheap”, giving away coupons for “Likes” is a fine thing for them to do.  In fact, there is little else they can do:

    http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/how-do-you-market-cheap-socially/

    Cheers,

    BW

  • http://www.twitter.com/sameerpatel Sameer Patel

    Why make “like” a condition then?

  • http://www.customerthink.com Bob Thompson

    News flash: loyalty schemes are not about real loyalty, either.

  • cathy lee