Lotusphere: Looking for the Business In Social Business

Vinnie Mirchandani, in his patented ‘what’s really happening’ style of analysis pens an insightful post on his impressions of Lotusphere 2011.

“Doug did not use the word “Grand Challenges”  but he might as well have because in IBM’s vision a “social business” rethinks traditional CRM, HRM, PLM, SCM – almost every area of business where in Doug’s view you can “optimize workforce efficiency”. Indeed, IBM in another session identified it as its “$100B social business marketplace” opportunity. It calls it the “fifth shift in business technology”  – from the Mainframe to Departmental computing to the PC to the Internet and now to Social Business.

If the vision was Grand, the event seemed too tactical for it. In the Monday keynote, the audience increasingly grew restless with the concepts, and wanted to see product demos. During a customer panel, someone from the audience tweeted.

“Wish the panelists were being asked how IBM/Lotus software was helping them, rather than vague #socbiz questions”

IBM

Elsewhere on the left coast, I stopped by IBMs 100 year celebratory event last night in San Francisco for an hour. I had a chance to spend time with Craig Stevenson – Global Portfolio Leader for Consumer Experience. In plain English, that means Craig runs the retail portfolio of products and services at IBM. We spent a good 20 minutes talking about his impressions of the retail business in general and how technology investment has been back loaded on supply chain and operational efficiency side. Specifically we exchanged views on a number of things: a) less emphasis to date on the consumer experience in the store and the tie in of that valuable data into traditional customer experience management, b) fluid point of sales (not at the counter but on the customers phone when they are in the store), and c) the power of real-time customer intelligence. Net net, the front office has really been ignored and there’s lots of untapped value there to tie in people interaction into stogy data crunching of yore, to come up with better customer experience optimization.

Contrast this with Vinnie’s points as well as the comments made by my dear friend Paul Greenberg who was at Lotusphere:

“But even if Lotus had been vibrant, the move to social CRM, HRM, SCM, PLM etc. will need substantially more extensions, new types of services and partnerships. Paul Greenberg, who knows a thing or two about SCRM, told me at lunch and later tweeted

“They are still weak in #scrm. Haven’t figured that out & though its right in front of them w/their entry points.”

Ditto for social HRM, PLM, SCM.

To be fair, in this post by Dennis Howlett, Paul Greenberg was impressed by a particular case study on “how the government of Trinidad spends about $10 per head with IBM to deliver government outreach services to all its citizens. He thinks this was the best social use case he had heard.”

I don’t mean to take away from the tons of value for existing information management customers of IBM. And to some, the layering in of Social Business as the new hipper incarnation of information management will be a welcome injection of energy and hope. The banter on Twitter and overall excitement from employees confirms this. Something that’s invaluable as the organization gets behind what they consider to be a $100B market.

But based on what were seeing in our work and other executive I engage with, the opportunity lost in my opinion was that those very folks at IBM who are dealing with gnarly business problems with customers in retail, in health care or financial services should have been framing the value proposition for IBMs social business focus. These folks don’t have the luxury of using a glossy to market a new way of work – they need to provide proof points along the way before they earn the currency to even suggest large scale transformation to the end customer that buys IBM products and services.

I realize that the event is called “Lotusphere” for a reason. Its about Lotus products. But lets get one thing straight: Looking at social business, the theme of this event, as a fix to knowledge management, collaboration, portals, document management alone will be a colossal undersell of the overall promise of enterprise social computing. The problems that need fixing lie at the points of revenue (sales), operational efficiency (margins), innovation (the offer) and of course, risk management (predictability). And that’s the framework needed to realize business potential from the promise of social business.

Vinnie ends with a strong assessment, not requiring me to come up with a punchy closer to this post:

“And therein lie IBM’s Grand Challenges. Talk to customers about impact on their industries and their processes. And don’t just talk “vision” – bring the solutions to facilitate their becoming Social Businesses. “

I’ve stuck to this particular point as opposed to trying to review an event that I did not attend. For more overarching accounts from folks that were on the ground, take a look at what Bill Ives and Alex Williams have to say.


Written on: 02-02-11 · Written by: Sameer Patel · 6 Comments »

This entry is filed under Enterprise and Social Sofware, Event Reviews, Profesional Services. Connect on .

  • http://www.estebankolsky.com Esteban Kolsky

    So,

    let me see if i get this straight – IBM figures out in the thought leadership way how to properly do social business – but falls short when commercializing the concept.

    when did i hear that before?

  • http://www.twitter.com/sameerpatel Sameer Patel

    Funny – IBM certainly aren’t the first ones to do what you say. But they have an opp to really nail the true promise of Social Business, like no other.

  • http://twitter.com/johnstepper John Stepper

    Thanks for this, Sameer. I appreciate you being “counter-revolutionary”, gentling nudging us to stop touting social business as a revolution and instead go back to the fields and reap some real, practical benefits. (How’s that for stretching a metaphor?)

    On the internet, perhaps, simply communicating via social media may drive change and even influence governments. But in the enterprise, we need more than just sharing and connecting. We need to embrace the hard work of changing what people do every day. We need to develop a deep understanding of how employees work with each other and how they interact with customers.

    That means an emphasis on generating profits and eliminating waste rather than generating buzz and aiming for a higher number of users.

  • http://www.teleplace.com Anthony Nemelka

    In early 1998, IBM identified CRM systems as the #1 investment priority for large enterprises. Those insights came via systematic conversations with customers. I know because I was there and participated in the analysis. Product and industry silos (still in evidence in the “lotus” and “retail” conversations you write about above) caused some delay in taking advantage of those insights, but by late 1999 IBM had established a very strong strategic partnership with Siebel to drive CRM adoption across its customer base.

    This time around the insight is Social Business, but Lotus may prove to be a big distraction for IBM. Without Lotus, they’d probably be all over companies like Jive– busy figuring out how to leverage their business process engineering DNA with 3rd party social collaboration technology platforms like Jive and others.

    If Social Business is really as big an opportunity as IBM suggests it is, they need to move their Social Business initiatives beyond the Lotus ecosystem. Though no one is in a better position to make Social Business a reality than IBM, it’s their strength in business process engineering that the market is yearning for–not a social software stack that only a small percentage of people will ever use.

    Anthony Nemelka
    CEO
    Teleplace, Inc.
    http://www.teleplace.com

  • http://www.twitter.com/sameerpatel Sameer Patel

    #ls11 #e20 #socbiz Couldn’t agree with you more. I’m really really excited that #IBM is making a serious play. They have the components and a command over hairy enterprise problems that will make the efforts of many others look like childs play.
    I’ve seen one too many other examples of this where it fizzled and I sincerely hope that IBM has a direct line between those that made the bold $100B market statement and those that can truly get them there. I can see it pretty clearly.

    Thanks for the comment, T. You know the inner workings better than most. :)

  • http://www.twitter.com/sameerpatel Sameer Patel

    Thanks for reading, John. The way I look at it, you need to earn the right and currency to call a revolution, a revolution.

    You nail it with “But in the enterprise, we need more than just sharing and connecting. We need to embrace the hard work of changing what people do every day.”
    Most leaders dont have the luxury of ignoring core business tenants of the time and are hardly waiting around to adopt a new problem, challenge or performance metric until they have the ones they own in tip top shape :)